RESUMO
Background: Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria is a rare, acquired disease characterized by hemolytic episodes and associated with significant clinical burden. The introduction of C5 inhibitory monoclonal antibodies (C5i) represented a major breakthrough in PNH treatment, effectively reducing intravascular hemolysis (IVH) but showing limited impact on extravascular hemolysis (EVH). In 2021, the C3 inhibitor pegcetacoplan was approved by EMA and recently reimbursed in Italy, which also has the advantages in the reduction of both IVH and EVH, increasing hemoglobin values and simultaneously improving the quality of life and fatigue of patients. A cost-utility analysis was developed to compare pegcetacoplan to C5i (eculizumab and ravulizumab) in the PNH population who remain anemic after treatment with C5i for at least 3 months. Materials and Methods: The analysis employed a Markov model with a 5-year time horizon whereby patients can transition among 3 PNH health states, adopting the perspective of the Italian NHS. Efficacy data were sourced from the PEGASUS study, with drug prices reflecting ex-factory costs. Additionally, costs associated with resource utilization, adverse events, and complications were estimated based on outpatient and hospital care rates, excluding indirect expenses. Utility and disutility values related to transfusions were also considered, with pegcetacoplan allowing for dose escalation. Results: The cumulative cost of treatment per individual patient at 5 years was estimated to be 1,483,454 for pegcetacoplan, 1,585,763 for eculizumab, and 1,574,826 for ravulizumab. Pegcetacoplan demonstrated a superior increase in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) compared to both eculizumab (0.51 increase) and ravulizumab (0.27 increase). Furthermore, pegcetacoplan showed a reduction in complication management costs (22,891 less compared to eculizumab and 22,611 less compared to ravulizumab) and lower transfusion-related expenses (14,147 less than both C5i treatments). Conclusion: Pegcetacoplan emerged as the dominant strategy in this analysis, being more effective, less expensive and improves quality of life in the analyzed population affected by PNH.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular diseases pose a significant challenge to the society and healthcare systems, with serious implications in terms of mortality and healthcare expenditure. The treatment of cardiovascular diseases, based on acetylsalicylic acid combined with statins in multi-pill regimens, is characterized by a lower adherence rate among patients compared to the single-pill combination. A potential solution lies in single-pill formulations, drugs that combine two or more active ingredients at a fixed dosage within the same dosage unit. METHODS: In order to assess the potential pharmacoeconomic impact of single-pill treatment, a budget impact model (BIM) was developed, considering the combination of 100 mg acetylsalicylic acid and 5 mg, 10 mg, or 20 mg rosuvastatin. RESULTS: The use of the single pill, according to the selected scenario, could result in savings in Italy compared to the use of multi-pill at 100%, ranging from 951 201 in the case of using both single and multi-pill at 50%, to 1 902 402 in the case of using the single pill exclusively. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the results. CONCLUSIONS: The developed BIM allows observing the potential savings that single-pill treatment could generate, linked both to an increase in adherence rates and the consequent improvement in clinical outcomes for patients, as well as the lower cost of medications. The use of single pills represents a promising solution to enhance patient adherence and reduce costs in the management of cardiovascular diseases in Italy.
